Grand Canyon University Spanking Logic Fallacies Critical Thinking Essay

Topic: Spanking
Use Google Scholar’s library to locate two peer-reviewed articles on yourchosen topic. The articles should argue opposite sides of the controversy.
In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly explain the claims of both articles as well as thebackground of the controversy and how it became controversial.Including how historical perspectives and theories add to thecontroversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles andexplain which article creates a stronger argument.
Identifyany logic fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes themlogic fallacies (For a list of logical fallacies, follow this linkhttps://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/).
Describe why the article’s argument is stronger than the other.Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives andtheories support your rationale.
Describe how thecontroversy you chose is applicable and significant to theworld.
Use five to six scholarly references to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APAStyle Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior tobeginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations forsuccessful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please referto the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmaticcompetencies: 1.1: Describe key historical perspectives and theoriesin psychology, 1.2: Differentiate among current perspectivesand theories in psychology, and 1.3: Describe applications of psychology.

“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”