Grand Canyon Clostridium difficile Literature Evaluation Table Paper

Please see attachment of SAMPLE of Literature Evaluation Table based on PICOT statement Clostridium Difficile peer nursing articles
Literature Evaluation Table – Week 4
In nursing practice, accurate identification and application ofresearch is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able toarticulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articlesin a scholarly fashion helps to support the student’s ability and confidence tofurther develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments thatconstitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project.
For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eightpeer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table thatdetermines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles.The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate tothe PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may includequantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, ormeta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background informationfor the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the”Literature Evaluation Table” resource to complete this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment,solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references shouldbe presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APAStyle Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior tobeginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations forsuccessful completion.

“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”
Attachments
20190602052939sample___literature_evaluation_table___nrs_490_week_4_sample (70 kB)
20190602053014week_4___literature_evaluation_table (19 kB)