PHIL1040 Texas A & M University Death Penalty and Human Rights Questions
Write a short reflection statement (350-500 words) after reading Chapter 12. Use complete sentences and correct academic writing to complete this assignment.
Respond in writing to these items:
What are the two messages that would be sent by abolishing thedeath penalty according to Nathanson? How does he reply to the objectionthat murderers forfeit their right to be respected as human beings? Doyou agree with his argument? Why or why not?
Why is deterrence not a decisive factor in the debate about themorality of the death penalty according to van den Haag? Explain youranswers. Do you agree with his argument? Why or why not?
Why is “an eye for an eye” an attractive view according toNathanson? What are the two main problems he raises for this view, andwhat are the possible replies an advocate of such a view might make?
Do you relate more to the abolitionist or the retentionist position?
What do you see as the two strongest supporting arguments for your position, and why?
“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”