Complete the reading for Week 1 and respond to the following: Teach the class: In your own words, based on the required reading and a scholarly source that you select, define the concept of secondary small group and explain how this concept differs from small group and primary group. Then, think of any secondary small group (or a group with both primary and secondary characteristics) to which you have belonged in the past or to which you belong now. Briefly describe this group to the class. Then explain the small group throughput processes of your chosen group. If communication is the heart of this transformational process, how would you describe the quality of communication in your chosen group, and what would like to see improve? Respond substantively to a minimum of two peers by Day 7 of Week 1. Inquire about the character and dynamics of your fellow students’ small group experiences. Your main post should consist of 400 words.

Required Text Adams, K., & Galanes, G. (2017). Communicating in groups: Application and skills (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Chapter 1: Small Groups as the Heart of Society Chapter 2: Groups as Open Systems Required References Henman, L. (n.d.). Groups as systems [PDF file]. Retrieved from http://www.henmanperformancegroup.com/articles/group-systems.pdf (Links to an external site.) Recommended References Chang, J. (2008). The role of anonymity in deindividuation behavior: A comparison of deindividuation theory and the social identity model of deindividuation effects [Web page]. Retrieved from http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php?id=77099 (Links to an external site.) Haines, R., & Cheney Mann, J. E. (2011). A new perspective on de-individuation via computer-mediated communication. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 156-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.70 Kets de Vries, M.F.R. (2013, December). The Eight Archetypes of Leadership [Web page]. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/12/the-eight-archetypes-of-leadership (Links to an external site.) PsyBlog. (n.d.) Social loafing: When groups are bad for productivity [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.spring.org.uk/2009/05/social-loafing-when-groups-are-bad-for-productivity.php (Links to an external site.) Tripp and Tyler. (2014). A conference call in real life [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYu_bGbZiiQ

“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”