Please pay attention to specific instructions
Authorities in every academicdiscipline share certain expectations and norms for publication in theirscholarly journals and texts. While specialists in some disciplinesuphold a strict standard of academic writing, other experts allow a moreflexible rhetorical style. In general, however, academic writers striveto influence their discourse communities by following the expectednorms.
While communities of scholars strive to ensure quality intheir disciplines, they also recognize a certain level of subjectivityin determining the quality of academic writing. Analyzing each author’squality of evidence, awareness of the target audience, and potential forpersonal bias will help you determine the appropriateness of books,articles, and other documents that you read. For this Assignment, youanalyze scholarly articles. As you review the articles, consider theways that the different backgrounds of the authors and their readers mayaffect both the creation and the interpretation of the writing.
To prepare:
Identify at least 3 peer review elements within one of the articles by Leslie-Bole and Perramond, Piotrowski, and Rivera and Ward.
Use specific examples to explain which article you consider to be the most professional and well written.
See the “Assignment Rubric” in “Course Information” before you begin.
************Theassignment: at least three to four pages*************************
Analyze the article you selected (see above in “to prepare”) by doing each of the following:
Evaluatingthe quality of evidence, appropriateness of the content and writingstyle for the target audience, and the author’s potential bias. Then,explain whether the article meets professional standards for scholarlywriting and why.
Explaining how various audiences might perceive the author’s intent and message.
Explaining how you might revise the article to make it more appropriate for an international audience.
The essence of your paper should contain enough details and citationsto explain how your article is related to public policy andadministration and your field of interest.. Make certain to include afew examples as well.
You may structure your application as follows:
1. APA 6th edition
3. Required: Levels of Heading: Quality of Evidence, Credibility of Sources, Target Audience, and Conclusion.
4. Reference List-formatted according to APA 6th edition standards.
Resources:
Cornell University Library. (n.d.). Distinguishing scholarly from non-scholarly periodicals: A checklist of criteria. Retrieved from http://guides.library.cornell.edu/scholarlyjournals
Leslie-Bole, H., & Perramond, E. P. (2017). Oyster feuds: Conflicting discourses and outcomes in Point Reyes, California. Journal of Political Ecology, 24, 2. Retrieved from http://jpe.library.arizona.edu/volume_24/Leslie-Bole.pdf
Piotrowski,S. J. (2017). The “Open Government Reform” movement: The case of theopen government partnership and US transparency policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 155-171. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Rivera, M. A., & Ward, J. D. (2017). Toward an analytical framework for the study of race and police violence. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 242-250. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Walden University: Introduction to scholarly writing: Plagiarism and academic integrity [Video file].
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Walden University: Introduction to scholarly writing: Finding a scholarly voice [Video file].
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Walden University: Introduction to scholarly writing: Purpose, audience, and evidence [Video file].
“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”
